Understanding Literacy Level in Vocational Schools in Padang Pariaman Regency
Abstract
Responding to the low interest among Indonesian students has prompted the government to formulate strategic policies to guarantee the future success of national education. One of the strategies is emphasizing the establishment of literacy programs at schools. This research is expected to see the execution of the program and find out the obstacles in handling the program. The subjects of this research were the literacy teams of the schools that consist of the administrators, the teachers, and the principals of the vocational schools in Padang Pariaman Regency. Ten schools, both private and public, were selected as the focus of this study. The data was collected through interviews and observations through the stages of implementing the literacy movement guidelines from Kemdikbud. The result showed that the literacy movement in Padang Pariaman regency was still at the habituation level and needed further government’ attention. The obstacles were found from the lack of the headmaster and the teams’ understanding in comprehending the movement. Hence, the government needs to do accompaniment to implement the program successfully.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W. . dan K. D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing; A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Education Objectives. . Addison Wesley Lonman Inc.
Antasari, I. W. (2017). Support Parents On Building Children’s Literacy. Edulib, 6(2).
Antoro, B. (2017). Gerakan Literasi Sekolah:Dari Pucuk Hingga Akar Sebuah Refleksi . Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Dirjen Dikdasmen. (2016). Panduan Gerakan Literasi di Sekolah Menengah Atas . Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah KementerianPendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. .
Melda, Rumia, Rosmery., Simorangkir. (2023). Evaluative Study of The Effectiveness of the School Literacy Movement in High Schools. International journal of research and review. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.202302109
Mulyo Teguh. (2017). GERAKAN LITERASI SEKOLAH DASAR. AKTUALISASI KURIKULUM 2013 DI SEKOLAH DASAR MELALUI GERAKAN LITERASI SEKOLAH UNTUK MENYIAPKAN GENERASI UNGGUL DAN BERBUDI PEKERTI.
Nuryatin, S. (2020). Adaptasi Metode Pembelajaran Melalui E-Learning Untuk Menghadapi Era New Normal. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan Volume 8, No. 1, April 2021. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan , Volume 8, No. 1.
OECD. (2003). PISA The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2010). Draft PISA 2012 Assessment Framework . OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2015 Mathematics Framework. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2016). Programme for International Student Assesment (PISA). PISA Publishing.
Pangesti Wiedarti, D. (2016). Desain Induk Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (1st ed.). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Susanto, A. (2013). Teori Belajar & Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Prenada Media Group.
Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015. Paper of Matematohir.
Ulfa, Khaira., Mohammad, Amir, Wan, Harun., Rajab, B. (2019). Reading Habits, Interests, And Reading Comprehension Of Students In Schools Implementing School Literacy Movement. https://doi.org/doi: 10.26858/EST.V5I3.10211
