IMPLIKATUR KONVENSIONAL DALAM ACARA REPUBLIK SOSMED SEGMEN 4 (ROASTING) DI TRANS TV

  • Elan Halid Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin
  • Fitri Handayani Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin
Keywords: Conversational Implicature, Conventional Implicature, and Sosmed Republik Events

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe conventional implicatures in the Republic of Social Media Segment 4 (Roasting) on ​​Trans TV. The theories used in this study include: (a) the nature of pragmatics, (b) the nature of implicatures, (c) conventional implicatures, and (d) the Republic of Social Media program on Trans TV. This research used a descriptive method. Sources of data in this study were comics and guest stars in the Republik Sosmed program in segment 4 (Roasting) on ​​Trans TV. The results of this study include: (a) on the Republic of Social Media program segment 4 (roasting), there were 5 conventional implicature data, (b) on October 08, 2017 presented comic Ridwan Remin, there were 2 conventional implicature data, (c) on October 14, 2017 presented comic Ridwan Remin, there were 3 implicature data, (d) on October 15 2017 presenting comic Yuda Keling, there were 3 conventional implicature data, (e) on October 21 2017 presenting comics Tretan and Rizki, there was 1 conventional implicature data, (f) on October 22, 2017 presenting the comics Tretan and Coki, there were 2 conventional implicature data, (g) on ​​October 28, 2017 presenting, the comic Yuda Keling there was 1 conventional implicature data, and (h) on October 29, 2017 presenting the comic Yuda Keling, there were 3 conventional implicature data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atmazaki. (2007). Kiat-kiat Mengarang dan Menyunting. Padang: UNP Press.

Bungin. M. B. 2010. Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana.

Haliko, M. K. (2017). Implikatur Percakapan dalam Talk Show Hitam Putih di TRANS 7. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra. 2 (1), 77-85.

Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Lubis, A. H. H. (2011). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.

Mahsun. (2006). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Moleong, L. J. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitiatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana. (2001). Implikatur dalam Kajian Pragmatik. Jurnal Diksi. 8(19): 53-63.

Rahardi, K. (2005). Pragmatik Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Erlangga.

Rahardi, K. (2009). Sosiopragmatik. Yogyakarta: PT Gelora Aksara Pratama.

Ramadan, S. (2008). Pragmatik Kesantunan Berbahasa: Menyibak Fenomena Berbahasa Indonesia Guru dan Siswa. Padang: UNP Press.

Simanjutak, T. A. (2019). Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Diskusi Mahasiswa dan Relevansinya Terhadap Pembelajaran Profesi Kependidikan di FKIP UHN Pematangsiantar. Jurnal IdeBahasa. 1(1): 65-76.

Thomas, L. dan Wareing, S. (2007). Bahasa, Masyarakat, dan Kekuasaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wulandari, dkk. (2018). Analisis Implikatur dalam Percakapan Mahasiswa di Tempat Umum. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Jurusan PBSI. 3(2): 154-164.

Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Published
2021-06-29
How to Cite
Halid, E., & Handayani, F. (2021). IMPLIKATUR KONVENSIONAL DALAM ACARA REPUBLIK SOSMED SEGMEN 4 (ROASTING) DI TRANS TV. IdeBahasa, 3(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.37296/idebahasa.v3i1.55
Section
Jurnal Ide Bahasa Vol. 3 No. 1 Juni 2021