KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DALAM DISKUSI MAHASISWA DAN RELEVANSINYA TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN PROFESI KEPENDIDIKAN DI FKIP UHN PEMATANGSIANTAR

  • Tarida Alvina Simanjuntak Universitas HKBP Nommensen
Keywords: Language Politeness, Student discussion, Education Profession, Universitas HKBP Nommensen

Abstract

The objectives of this study are (1)to find out the realization of the principle of politeness in learning the Education Profession, and (2) to find out the principle of politeness that is dominantly used by students in discussions. The population in the study was all students who took the professional education courses in the German language education program and Christian religious education at the teaching learning fakulty Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar. The sample in this study is the entire population.This study used descriptive qualitative method. This research is a qualitative research that relies on phenomenology. This is because this research examines social phenomena (human actions) including the use of language.Data from the results of this study indicate that (1) The politeness principle used in the discussion activities in the teaching professional learning in Christianity education study programs and German language education there are 92 speeches. There are also 13 wisdom utterances, 2 generosity maxims, 3 praise utterances maxims, 1 speech modest maxim, 10 maxims of agreement, and 2 utterances of praise. Language politeness in discussions in the teaching profession is polite. Because most of them use polite speech in accordance with the principle of politeness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alwasilah, C. 2002. Dasar-Dasar Merancang dan Melakukan Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT Dunia Jaya.

Brown, F dan Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness, Some Universals of Language Usage: Cambrige University Press.

Chaer, A. 1994. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djajasudarma, F. 1993. Metode Linguistik Ancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian, Bandung: PT. ERESCO.

Leech, G. 1993. Prinsip- Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Murni, S.M. 2008. Kesantunan Linguistik dalam Ranah Sidang Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Disertasi Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Moleong, J.L. 2004. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Mahsun, M.S. 2007. Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: PT. Raja Gravindo Perseda.

Minda, S. 2008. Kesantunan Linguistik dalam Ranah Sidang Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Disertasi Universitas Sumatera Utara

Muslich, M. 2006. Kesantunan Berbahasa. Malang

Nababan, PWJ. 1986. Sosiolinguistik: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT.Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Oktavianus. 2006. Analisis wacana Lintas Bahasa. Padang: Andalas University Press

Rahardi, K. 2005. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga

Silalahi, P.R. 2012. Analisis Kesantunan Berbahasa Mahasiswa/i di Lingkungan Sekolah SMP Negeri 5 Binjai. Jurnal FBS Universitas Negeri Medan.

Simpen, I.W. 2008. Kesantunan Berbahasa Pada Penutur Bahasa Kambera di Sumba Timur. Disertasi Universitas Udayana Denpasar.

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Yule, G.2006. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Published
2019-05-15
How to Cite
Alvina Simanjuntak, T. (2019). KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA DALAM DISKUSI MAHASISWA DAN RELEVANSINYA TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN PROFESI KEPENDIDIKAN DI FKIP UHN PEMATANGSIANTAR. IdeBahasa, 1(1), 65-76. Retrieved from https://jurnal.idebahasa.or.id/index.php/Idebahasa/article/view/9
Section
Jurnal Ide Bahasa Vol. 1 No. 1 Juni 2019