Common Error in Using English Tenses by EFL Students
Abstract
Most of English foreign language learners (EFL) in the beginning level face some problems in learning English. They commited different kinds of errors and mistakes in learning English as a foreign language which were due to poor knowledge with grammar. Most of students considered that grammar was difficult, thus their motivation to learn English was also poor. Moreover, problems in foreign language learning especially in English were unavoidable. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify common error in using English tenses by EFL students in the first semester at Putera Batam University. The instrument used was a test on basic English tenses and the data consisted of 50 students. The data sources were taken from the result of students’ test itself. It showed that students’ errors were categorized into six types; (1) Subject – auxiliary agreement, (2) Pronoun mistake or subject was wrong, meanwhile auxiliary verb or verb was right, (3) Auxiliary verb was correct meanwhile verb still added –es/s, (4) Auxiliary verb was wrong in sentence, (5) Double subject in sentence, (6) The sentence did not have subject or verb. Based on the result, it can be concluded some mistakes that students made were caused of they did not really understand the pattern of English tenses. Therefore, students should be given more attention and motivation to learn kinds of tenses correctly.
Downloads
References
Brown, J.D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press
Chowdhury, M. M. H. (2014). Teaching grammar in the English language classroom in Saudi universities. Express, 1(1), 1–9.
Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. D. (1982). Language two. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gardner, J. and H. McNally. (1995). Supporting school-based initial teacher training with interactive video. British Journal of Educational Technology 26: 30-41.
Hornby, A. (1987). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Incecay, V. (2011). Foreign language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3394–3398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.307
Littlewood, W. (1984). Foreign and second language learning. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press.
Noertjahjono, Mochamad. (2008). An error analysis on the use of simple present tense among the ninth year students of SMPN 3 Pare in 2007/2008. Thesis. Malang: IKIP Budi Utomo Malang.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing task for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pardiyono. (2007). Bahasa Inggris 16 tenses. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Pazaver, A., & Wang, H. (2009). Asian students’ perceptions of grammar teaching in the ESL classroom point of entry. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 4(27), 27–35.
Rahman, M. S., & Ali, M. (2015). Problems in mastering English tense and aspect and the role of the practitioners. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 20(4), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2041131135
Richards, J. C., and T. S. Rodgers. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rutherford, W. (1988) Grammatical consciousness raising in brief historical perspective. In W. Rutherford and M. Sharwood Smith (eds.), Grammar and second language teaching. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
