STUDENTS’ LISTENING COMPREHENSION PEFORMANCE IN THE MINI TALKS SECTION OF THE TOEFL (PBT)

  • Aidil Fitra Amanda Universitas mahaputra muhammad yamin
  • Fitri Handayani Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin
  • Risza Dwiputri Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin
Keywords: listening section, mini talks section, students’ ability, TOEFL Paper-Based Test

Abstract

Listening comprehension is one of the essential skills tested in the TOEFL Paper-Based Test (PBT), and the Mini Talks section is often considered the most challenging. Students must concentrate on fast-paced monologues containing dense information and answer several questions at once. Observations and interviews revealed that many students failed to capture key details, lacked strategies to filter important information, and struggled to handle multiple questions within a short time. Based on these problems, this study aimed to describe the students’ listening ability and identify the difficulties they faced when answering Mini Talks questions in the TOEFL PBT. This study used a descriptive quantitative method. The participants were 16 eighth-semester students of the English Education Department at Universitas Mahaputra Muhammad Yamin, Solok, in the 2024/2025 academic year. Data were collected using a listening test focusing on the Mini Talks section, and the students’ scores were analyzed to determine their average performance and the easiest and most difficult question types. The results showed that the students’ average score in the Mini Talks section was 47.7, categorized as “fair.” The easiest question type was purpose (68.8%), while the most difficult was attitude and opinion (34.4%). The findings indicate that students had the most difficulty interpreting tone, making inferences, and identifying key information from audio played only once. This study suggests the need for more targeted listening practice and effective teaching strategies to improve students’ performance in the TOEFL PBT listening section.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aprino, D., Alfrida, & Lubis, A. A. (2022). English students’ difficulties in understanding listening section of the TOEFL test. Journal of English Education and Teaching (JEET), 6(2), 250–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.6.2.250-270

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment principles and classroom practices. New York: Longman.

Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Fitria, T. N. (2021). An analysis of the students ’ difficulties in TOEFL prediction test of listening section. ENGLISHFRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education Vol., 5(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29240/ef.v5i1.2212

Flowerdew, J., & Lindsay, M. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gear, J., & Gear, R. (2008). Cambridge preparation for the TOEFL test. Cambridge University Press.

Hadist, M. K., Hidjanah, Dtakiyatuddaaimah, & Dewanti, L. (2022). An analysis of EFL students’ difficulties in listening comprehension at STKIP Muhammadiyah Bogor. Jurnal Educatio, 8(1), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i1.1847

Handayani, F. (2019). Structure and Written Expression Section on Paper-Based TOEFL : Perceived Difficulties by Nursing Students of Poltekes Solok, West Sumatera. JURNAL EDUCATIVE: Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2), 135–149.

La’biran, R., & Dewi, R. (2023). Exploring students’ difficulties in TOEFL listening. ENGLISH FRANCA Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 7(2), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v621.5242

Malik, A. (2018). Pengantar Statistika Pendidikan Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama.

Nuraida, N., & Sartika. (2025). Unpacking listening barriers: An investigation into EFL learners’ difficulties in the TOEFL ITP context. GLOBAL: Education Language and Humanity Journal, 3(1), 23–38.

Pasaribu, T. K., Sihite, J., Pasaribu, D. R., Pasaribu, D., & Siburian, S. A. (2023). Listening difficulties of EFL students on short talk of the ITP TOEFL. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(3), 5063–5073.

Riduwan. (2009). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rina, P., & Tiarina, Y. (2021). An analysis of English department students ’ difficulties in answering TOEFL test of listening comprehension. Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v10i1.111355

Rogers, S. (2011). The Complete Guide to the TOEFL Test (PBT Edition). Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.

Sari, A. R., Husnawati, H. Al, Suryono, J., Marzuki, & Mulyapradana, A. (2025). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Putra Adi Dharma.

Sharpe, P. J. (2024). Barron’s TOEFL iBT premium. New York: Kaplan North America.

Soali, M., & Pujiani, T. (2020). Error Analysis of Non- English Students Department in Answering Listening Section in TOEFL. Journal of Law, Ekonomic, and English, 2(1), 21–39. http://ejournal.uhb.ac.id/index.php/J-LEE/issue/archive

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukandra, I. K., & Atmaja, I. K`. (2020). Instrumen penelitian. Pontianak: Mahameru Press.

Yuliandani,R. P., Ilhsanudin, & Sumarni, (2022). Analyzing students’ TOEFL Listening Comprehesion test Peformance. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 3(1), https://doi.org/10.26418/jeek.v3i10.7275

Published
2025-12-25
How to Cite
Amanda, A. F., Handayani, F., & Dwiputri, R. (2025). STUDENTS’ LISTENING COMPREHENSION PEFORMANCE IN THE MINI TALKS SECTION OF THE TOEFL (PBT). IdeBahasa, 7(2), 279-287. https://doi.org/10.37296/idebahasa.v7i2.360
Section
Jurnal IdeBahasa Vol 7 No 2 Desember 2025