ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ABILITY TO IDENTIFY MAIN IDEAS OF AURAL TEXTS AND INDONESIAN LANGUAGE LEARNING OUTCOMES

  • Salwa Naofalia Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Keywords: main ideas, aural texts, Indonesian language, learning outcomes, elementary school, correlational research

Abstract

Listening skills, particularly the ability to identify main ideas in aural texts, constitute an important foundation in Indonesian Language learning at elementary schools, yet their relationship with student learning outcomes has not been extensively explored empirically. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the ability to identify main ideas in aural texts and Indonesian Language learning outcomes among fourth-grade elementary school students. The study employed a quantitative correlational approach involving 30 fourth-grade students. Data were collected through multiple-choice written tests to measure the ability to identify main ideas in aural texts and documentation of final semester summative scores. Data analysis used the Spearman Rank correlation test due to non-normal data distribution. The results showed that students' ability to identify main ideas in aural texts was in the good category with an average of 83.27, as well as Indonesian Language learning outcomes with an average of 83.633. There was a significant positive relationship with moderate strength between the ability to identify main ideas in aural texts and Indonesian Language learning outcomes (rs = 0.523; p = 0.003). The contribution of the main idea identification ability variable to learning outcomes was 27.35 percent. The research implies the importance of developing systematic listening learning strategies to improve overall Indonesian Language learning outcomes

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students’ reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40(6), 1063–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9202-5

Beall, M. L., Gill-Rosier, J., Tate, J., & Matten, A. (2008). State of the context: listening in education. International Journal of Listening, 22(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904010802174826

Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2010). Listening comprehension, oral expression, reading comprehension, and written expression: Related yet unique language systems in grades 1, 3, 5, and 7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019319

Bozorgian, H. (2012). The relationship between listening and other language skills in international english language testing system. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.657-663

Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: the development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80002-4

Curtis, E. A., Comiskey, C., & Dempsey, O. (2016). Importance and use of correlational research. Nurse Researcher, 23(6), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2016.e1382

de Winter, J. C. F., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2016). Comparing the pearson and spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: a tutorial using simulations and empirical data. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000079

Elashhab, S. A. (2013). Main idea identification strategies: efl readers’ awareness and success. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ, 4(1), 124–138. www.awej.orgwww.awej.orgwww.awej.org

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Speaking and listening in content area learning. Reading Teacher, 68(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1296

Ghasemi, A., & Zahediasl, S. (2012). Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 10(2), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.3505

Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). Learners’ listening comprehension difficulties in english language learning: a literature review. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 123. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p123

Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.81

Henry, A. R., & Solari, E. J. (2020). Targeting oral language and listening comprehension development for students with autism spectrum disorder: a school-based pilot study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50(10), 3763–3776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04434-2

Hogan, T. P., Adlof, S. M., & Alonzo, C. N. (2014). On the importance of listening comprehension. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(3), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.904441

J. Aarnoutse, C. A., van den Bos, K. P., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (1998). Effects of listening comprehension training on listening and reading. The Journal of Special Education, 32(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699803200206

Kim, Y.-S. G. (2016). Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension of oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.003

Kim, Y.-S. G. (2020). Hierarchical and dynamic relations of language and cognitive skills to reading comprehension: Testing the direct and indirect effects model of reading (DIER). Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000407

Kim, Y.-S. G., & Pilcher, H. (2016). What is listening comprehension and what does it take to improve listening comprehension? (pp. 159–173). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31235-4_10

Landry, S. H., Swank, P. R., Smith, K. E., Assel, M. A., & Gunnewig, S. B. (2006). Enhancing early literacy skills for preschool children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(4), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390040501

Mihret, G., & Joshi, J. (2024). A study on the relationship between students’ listening skills and academic achievements: a systematic literature review. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 568–575. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra17049

Mishra, P., Pandey, C., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249

Muijselaar, M. M. L., Swart, N. M., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. F. (2017). Developmental relations between reading comprehension and reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763

O’malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.4.418

Peelle, J. E., & Wingfield, A. (2016). The neural consequences of age-related hearing loss. Trends in Neurosciences, 39(7), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2016.05.001

Stevens, E. A., Park, S., & Vaughn, S. (2019). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in grades 3 through 12: 1978–2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517749940

Suggate, S., Schaughency, E., McAnally, H., & Reese, E. (2018). From infancy to adolescence: The longitudinal links between vocabulary, early literacy skills, oral narrative, and reading comprehension. Cognitive Development, 47, 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.04.005

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040

Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004338

Published
2025-12-25
How to Cite
Naofalia, S. (2025). ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ABILITY TO IDENTIFY MAIN IDEAS OF AURAL TEXTS AND INDONESIAN LANGUAGE LEARNING OUTCOMES. IdeBahasa, 7(2), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.37296/idebahasa.v7i2.368
Section
Jurnal IdeBahasa Vol 7 No 2 Desember 2025