CAMPAIGN AGAINST FAST FASHION AS AN IDEOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the construction of ideological meaning related to sustainability and consumption in Josephine Philip’s speech entitled “The Simple Solution to Fast Fashion.” The data source of this research was the transcript of the speech, which was examined using Teun A. van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis framework. This study employed a descriptive qualitative method; the data were collected through observation and transcription, and were analyzed using content analysis focusing on macrostructure, superstructure, and microstructure. The findings revealed that the speech constructed fast fashion as a global environmental crisis through three interconnected ideological themes: global waste impact, individual responsibility in garment repair, and a call to action. At the macro level, the thematic focus reframed fast fashion from a lifestyle issue into an urgent ecological concern; at the superstructural level, the speech was coherently organized from personal narrative to global consequences and persuasive solutions; and at the microstructural level, semantic emphasis, syntactic coherence, lexical repetition, pronoun variation, and rhetorical strategies reinforced ideological meaning and guided audience interpretation. Overall, the speech functioned not only as informative discourse but also as an ideological intervention that shaped social cognition and encouraged sustainable behavior, and future research is recommended to explore similar environmental speeches in different contexts to enrich discourse studies on sustainability.
Downloads
References
Aljuaythin, W. (2020). A critical discourse analysis of female role assignment in Saudi and American advertisements. Asiatic: IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature, 14(1), 217–231.
Baldoni, J. (2023). The Leader’s Guide to Speaking with Presence: How to Project Confidence, Conviction, and Authority. HarperChristian+ ORM.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research designs. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power (2nd edn). Harlow. UK: Pearson Education.
Fauzi, J. A. N., & Mulyana, M. (2023). analisis wacana kritis model Teun A. van Dijk dalam lirik lagu" mangku purel" ciptaan nurbayan. Jurnal Online Baradha, 19(1), 290–301.
Fitriana, R. A. (2019). Analisis wacana kritis berita online kasus penipuan travel umrah (model Teun A. Van Dijk). Basindo, 3(1), 44–54.
Humaira, H. W. (2018). Analisis wacana kritis (AWK) model Teun A. Van Dijk Pada pemberitaan surat kabar Republika. Literasi: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia Serta Pembelajarannya, 2(1), 32–40.
Islamiyah, H. Y., & Hermaliza, H. (2024). Teun A. van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis on kompas.com news. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 8(1), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v8i1.9280
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif (revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 102–107.
Sahmeni, E., & Afifah, N. (2019). Journal of research and innovation in language using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) in media discourse studies: unmask the mass media article history 1(2). http://ojs.journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers.
Solikhin, N. H. (2023). Analisis wacana kritis model Teun A. Van Dijk berita serangan tentara israel di jalur Gaza. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Sosial Humaniora, 2(7), 853–861.
Sugiyono, M. R. (2018). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Untuk penelitian yang bersifat: eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif dan konstruktif. Cocok Untuk: 1. Mahasiswa SI, S2, S3. 2. Dosen dan peneliti Ed. 3 Cet. 2 Thn. 2018.
Irwandi, I. $& Suroso, S. (2024). Comparative study of post-marriage nationality of women in legal systems of different countries, van dijk model critical discourse analysis of tiktok content ‘kehidupan rumah tangga’ in gender perspective. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. 11(9). 163-174 https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i9.6001
Susanti, S., Deliana, & Pujiono, M. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of teun a. van dijk’s model on detik.com and kompas.com news texts about citayam fashion week. Britain International of Linguistics Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal, 5(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.33258/biolae.v5i3.1021
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Discourse and ideology. Discourse & Society.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as structure and process (Vol. 1). Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse, cognition, society. the discourse studies reader: main currents in theory and analysis, 388.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. The handbook of discourse analysis, 466–485.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2019). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Routledge.






